Re: [RFC PATCH 7/X] ptrace: mv task->parent ptrace_task->pt_tracer

[Roland McGrath]

> Well, SI_USER == 0, so si_code is zero. And SI_USER looks more
> consistent to me, because

Ah so.

> > so it's consistent with what collect_signal() produces
> > when a signal is posted with OOM for the sigq allocation.
> 
> perhaps it is better to change collect_signal() to set SI_USER ?
> Note that __send_signal() user SI_USER, not zero in is_si_special()
> case.

Sure, though as you point out it's purely cosmetic.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/