Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff

From: Oren Laadan
Date: Thu May 28 2009 - 18:43:55 EST

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:44:36PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx):
>>> And since you guys showed that just idea of in-kernel checkpointing is not
>>> rejected outright, it doesn't mean that you can drag every single idea too.
>> Can you rephrase here? I have no idea what you mean by 'drag every single
>> idea'
> complexity
> +-|------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-->
> hypervisor C/R in-kernel C/R C/R for unpriviledged
> C/R with "leaks"

c/r for unprivileged users is indeed more complex - requires more care.
Keep in mind, however, that most of that are sanity checks that we would
like to have in the code anyway.

c/r with "leaks" is actually a subset of the code that prevents leaks:
simply comment out the leak detection :)


> I personally thought in-kernel C/R will be rejected outright, but it wasn't.
> This in theory doesn't mean other two issues should be accepted.
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at