[PATCH 1/9] ia64: introduce arch-specific dma-mapping interfaces

From: Ian Campbell
Date: Fri May 29 2009 - 04:44:37 EST


dma_map_range is intended to replace usage of both
swiotlb_arch_range_needs_mapping and
swiotlb_arch_address_needs_mapping as __weak functions as well as
replacing is_buffer_dma_capable.

phys_to_dma and dma_to_phys are intended to replace
swiotlb_phys_to_bus and swiotlb_bus_to_phys. I choose to use dma
rather than bus since a) it matches the parameters and b) avoids
confusion on x86 with the existing (but deprecated) virt_to_bus
function which relates to ISA device DMA.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index 36c0009..7250e1a 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -174,4 +174,27 @@ dma_cache_sync (struct device *dev, void *vaddr, size_t size,

#define dma_is_consistent(d, h) (1) /* all we do is coherent memory... */

+static inline dma_addr_t phys_to_dma(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t paddr)
+{
+ return paddr;
+}
+
+static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t daddr)
+{
+ return daddr;
+}
+
+static inline bool dma_map_range(struct device *dev, u64 mask,
+ phys_addr_t addr, size_t size,
+ dma_addr_t *dma_addr_p)
+{
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, addr);
+
+ if (dma_addr + size > mask)
+ return false;
+
+ *dma_addr_p = dma_addr;
+ return true;
+}
+
#endif /* _ASM_IA64_DMA_MAPPING_H */
--
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/