Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

Larry H. wrote:
> OK, I'm going to squeeze some time and provide patches that perform the
> same my original page bit ones did, but using kzfree. Behold code like
> in the tty buffer management, which uses the page allocator directly for
> allocations greater than PAGE_SIZE in length. That needs special
> treatment, and is exactly the reason I've proposed unconditional
> sanitization since the original patches were rejected.

You might want to also do the patch Alan suggested for the security 
conscious people. That is, do a memset() in every page free and wrap 
that under CONFIG_SECURITY_PARANOIA or something. There's no reason the 
kzfree() patches and that can't co-exist.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/