Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

Larry H. wrote:
> > No, there's nothing wrong with ksize() I am aware of. Yes, Larry has
> > been saying it is but hasn't provided any evidence so far.
>
> Excuse me, do you have an attention or reading disorder? Compound pages
> and SLOB anyone? Duplication of test branches for pointer validation?

I don't see a bug there. I cc'd Matt Mackall who is the author of SLOB. 
I am sure he will be able to spot the bug if it in fact exists (which I 
seriously doubt).

Feel free to prove me wrong by sending a patch to fix SLOB. But until 
then, please stop spamming my inbox. Thanks!

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/