Re: [PATCH] hwrng: Add TX4939 RNG driver
From: Atsushi Nemoto
Date: Sun May 31 2009 - 13:18:29 EST
On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:00:09 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >From the datasheet:
> > The quality of the random numbers generated immediately after
> > reset can be insufficient. Therefore, do not use random
> > numbers obtained from the first and second generations; use
> > the ones from the third or subsequent generation.
> Does the datasheet say anything about -how- the random numbers are
> produced? Most physical sources that I'm aware of don't have this sort
> of issue. But some pseudo-RNGs do. So this looks a little worrisome.
Nothing for "how". If a RNG was actually a pseudo-RNG, does anything
a driver should do? Any future plan to select one RNG from multiple
sources based on randomness grade?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/