Re: [PATCH] update kernel's scripts/bloat-o-meter from busybox

From: Matt Mackall
Date: Mon Jun 01 2009 - 17:24:00 EST


On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 16:57 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Mon 1 Jun 2009 15:48, Matt Mackall pondered:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 15:26 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > > From: "Rob Landley" <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > From: "Denis Vlasenko" <vda.linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > From: "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" <rep.dot.nop@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Since bloat-o-meter was added to the kernel's source tree, it has
> > > received little attention - either it works really well - or no
> > > one uses it. I suspect the first :)
> > >
> > > However - some folks who have been using it more (mainly as part
> > > of busybox) have been poking at it more often - and the output is
> > > a little more friendly now.
> > >
> > > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/log/scripts/bloat-o-meter
> > >
> > > I think Rob had been sending early patches both places, but
> > > somewhere along the line things never made it to lkml.
> >
> > I probably dropped them on the ground during a busy spell.
>
> Sorry - I didn't mean to sound like I was trying to blame anyone.

And I'm just making sure Rob doesn't feel blamed. He did send me
patches, and they didn't go anywhere.

I can do a round of make-it-idiomatic-python after we get this merged,
that'll probably be more efficient than me picking nits.

--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/