Re: [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v9

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Ah, I see. Rather non-typical convention though. I expected
> > bdi_register() to clean-up stuff in case of failure. Isn't
> > it a better interface?
>
> You already did a bdi_init() at that point. bdi_destroy() must be used
> to clean up after both bdi_init() and/or bdi_register().

Right, silly me.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/