Re: Linux 2.6.30-rc8 [also: VIA Support]

[Michael S. Zick]

On Thu June 4 2009, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:38:13PM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
>  > I have already preceded that chunk of code with a printk and confirmed
>  > that x86_clflush_size is properly set to 64 bytes (somewhere else).
>  > 
>  > So your suggestion is the obvious one for the C7-M,
>  > I don't know about any other makes/models. 
>  > 
>  > This machine's C7-M is being reported as a "stepping 0" ??
>  > What is earlier than a stepping 0 ??
> 
> Earlier model numbers.
> (Stepping gets reset to 0 every time they bump the model)
> 

So 6.model=13.stepping=0 should do it for the (or this) C7-M, correct?
Your mention of "earlier models" will not apply until there is a
stepping >0 for a model=13, correct?

Would a good practice be to put a "WARN_ON" in there in case a stepping
greater than =0 happens to execute the code?
In addition to checking specificly for 6.13.0 (rather than just 6.13).

Hmmm...
But that is making a big mess of a small mess -
Why not just do the assignment you suggest for 6.model>=13?

Models earlier than 13 are evidently working (due to lack of
bug reports or other noise on this list).

Mike
> 	Dave
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/