[PATCH v2.1 04/17] EXOFS: do not manipulate s_dirt directly

From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Fri Jun 05 2009 - 07:16:40 EST


From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>

... use new VFS helpers instead.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/exofs/super.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exofs/inode.c b/fs/exofs/inode.c
index ba8d9fa..80d3d03 100644
--- a/fs/exofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/exofs/inode.c
@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ struct inode *exofs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, int mode)

sbi = sb->s_fs_info;

- sb->s_dirt = 1;
+ mark_sb_dirty(sb);
inode->i_uid = current->cred->fsuid;
if (dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) {
inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
diff --git a/fs/exofs/super.c b/fs/exofs/super.c
index 49e16af..9cf9738 100644
--- a/fs/exofs/super.c
+++ b/fs/exofs/super.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static void exofs_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
EXOFS_ERR("exofs_write_super: exofs_sync_op failed.\n");
goto out;
}
- sb->s_dirt = 0;
+ mark_sb_clean(sb);

out:
if (or)
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void exofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)

lock_kernel();

- if (sb->s_dirt)
+ if (is_sb_dirty(sb))
exofs_write_super(sb);

/* make sure there are no pending commands */
--
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/