Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nilfs tree

From: Ryusuke Konishi
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 01:41:53 EST

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:11:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflicts in
> fs/nilfs2/super.c between commits from the nilfs tree and similar commits
> from the vfs tree.
> The vfs and nilfs trees have different versions of the following patches:
> nilfs2: get rid of sget use for checking if current mount is present
> nilfs2: simplify remaining sget() use
> nilfs2: correct exclusion control in nilfs_remount function
> And the vfs tree has further commits that affect this files as well.
> For now, I have used the vfs tree version. Please sort this out.

I've confirmed that the patch series is applied to the vfs tree.

To avoid the conflict, I will remove them from my nilfs2 tree.

Ryusuke Konishi
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at