Re: [benchmark] 1% performance overhead of paravirt_ops on nativekernels
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 10:58:20 EST
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was benchmarking btrfs on my little EeePC. There, kmap overhead
> was 25% of file access time. Part of it is that people have been
> taught to use "kmap_atomic()", which is usable under spinlocks and
> people have been told that it's "fast". It's not fast. The whole
> TLB thing is slow as hell.
yeah. I noticed it some time ago that INVLPG is unreasonably slow.
My theory is that in the CPU it's perhaps a loop (in microcode?)
over _all_ TLBs - so as TLB caches get larger, INVLPG gets slower
and slower ...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/