Re: [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing/events/ring-buffer: block tracepoints and fix

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 21:32:17 EST



On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Li Zefan wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Ingo,
> >>
> >> Please pull the latest tip/tracing/ftrace tree, which can be found at:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> >> tip/tracing/ftrace
> >>
> >>
> >> Li Zefan (1):
> >> tracing/events: convert block trace points to TRACE_EVENT()
> >>
> >> Steven Rostedt (1):
> >> ring-buffer: fix ret in rb_add_time_stamp
> >>
> >> ----
> >> block/blk-core.c | 16 +-
> >> block/elevator.c | 8 +-
> >> drivers/md/dm.c | 5 +-
> >> fs/bio.c | 3 +-
> >> include/linux/blktrace_api.h | 13 ++
> >> include/trace/block.h | 76 -------
> >> include/trace/events/block.h | 483 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> kernel/trace/Makefile | 5 +-
> >> kernel/trace/blktrace.c | 78 +++++++-
> >> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
> >> mm/bounce.c | 5 +-
> >> 11 files changed, 589 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> >
> > I'm getting some build failures here:
> >
> > In file included from mm/highmem.c:30:
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:223: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h: In function ?blk_cmd_buf_len?:
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: implicit declaration of function ?blk_pc_request?
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:225: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h: At top level:
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:228: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
> > include/linux/blktrace_api.h:230: warning: ?struct request? declared inside parameter list
> > distcc[15629] ERROR: compile mm/highmem.c on a/32 failed
> >
>
> I've fixed it. I'll post a new version after I've done some
> more building tests.

Ingo,

Should Li post a delta fix, or should we just rebase?

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/