Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Jun 10 2009 - 15:11:59 EST
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 14:45, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for
> >> implementation details.
> > That can be opening a can of worms.
> no it isnt:
> config HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> Please see Documentation/trace/ftrace-implementation.txt
I'm fine with that, I was thing something else.
> > Really, the focus of the documentation in Kconfig is about why things must
> > be selected, not how to implement the code to add that selection.
> except that some of these defines come from the exact implementation details.
> > If there's a HAVE_XXX in Kconfig that I want to see how to implement it, I
> > go off and do 'grep -r XXX Documentation'.
> i look for the source of the define because ive given up on the
> Documentation actually being relevant
And you think documentation in Kconfig will be updated??
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/