Re: 2.6.31 -mm merge plans

[Amerigo Wang]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc's added)
>
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:08:41 +0100
> Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:51:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec.patch
> > > proc-merge-arrayc-into-basec-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> > >       
> > I'm not sure that there's any point in that.  Sure, we can slap two
> > files together; what the hell for?  Both are quite large, there's
> > a (relatively) sane separation of code between them (misc. files
> > contents in /proc/<pid>/ vs. directory structure and symlinks in
> > there, more or less) and I don't see any benefit in mashing them
> > together.  Up to Alexey, but IMO that's pointless.
> >     
>
> No strong opinions here.
>   

Hi, Al.

Just as what I said in the description of that patch, one only has 
extern functions that are _only_ used in another as function pointers.

And the size of code can't be a reason why they are seperated, we have
much more source files larger than this one. :)

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/