Re: [PATCH -v5] x86: MCE: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPUring buffer

From: Hidetoshi Seto
Date: Thu Jun 11 2009 - 02:43:26 EST


Huang Ying wrote:
> Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer for better
> scalability.

It seems your patch implicitly includes some bug fix for tip/mce3.
Still discussion of generic lockless ring buffer is going on, so how
about dividing the patch into 2 pieces, for improvement and for bug fix?

Maybe improvement part need to be reworked, so I pulled out the bug fix
part from your patch.

If it's all right, I'd like to put this on top of tip/mce3 asap.


Thanks,
H.Seto

==

[PATCH] x86, mce: fix mce printing

- Add print_mce_head() instead of first flag
- Make header to be printed always
- Stop double printing of corrected errors

[ This portion is originate from Huang Ying's patch ]

Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index d4e7b59..6a3127e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -180,12 +180,8 @@ void mce_log(struct mce *mce)
set_bit(0, &notify_user);
}

-static void print_mce(struct mce *m, int *first)
+static void print_mce(struct mce *m)
{
- if (*first) {
- printk(KERN_EMERG "\n" KERN_EMERG "HARDWARE ERROR\n");
- *first = 0;
- }
printk(KERN_EMERG
"CPU %d: Machine Check Exception: %16Lx Bank %d: %016Lx\n",
m->extcpu, m->mcgstatus, m->bank, m->status);
@@ -208,6 +204,11 @@ static void print_mce(struct mce *m, int *first)
m->apicid);
}

+static void print_mce_head(void)
+{
+ printk(KERN_EMERG "\n" KERN_EMERG "HARDWARE ERROR\n");
+}
+
static void print_mce_tail(void)
{
printk(KERN_EMERG "This is not a software problem!\n"
@@ -234,7 +235,6 @@ static void wait_for_panic(void)
static void mce_panic(char *msg, struct mce *final, char *exp)
{
int i;
- int first = 1;

/*
* Make sure only one CPU runs in machine check panic
@@ -245,23 +245,27 @@ static void mce_panic(char *msg, struct mce *final, char *exp)

bust_spinlocks(1);
console_verbose();
+ print_mce_head();
/* First print corrected ones that are still unlogged */
for (i = 0; i < MCE_LOG_LEN; i++) {
struct mce *m = &mcelog.entry[i];
- if ((m->status & MCI_STATUS_VAL) &&
- !(m->status & MCI_STATUS_UC))
- print_mce(m, &first);
+ if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_VAL))
+ continue;
+ if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_UC))
+ print_mce(m);
}
/* Now print uncorrected but with the final one last */
for (i = 0; i < MCE_LOG_LEN; i++) {
struct mce *m = &mcelog.entry[i];
if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_VAL))
continue;
+ if (!(m->status & MCI_STATUS_UC))
+ continue;
if (!final || memcmp(m, final, sizeof(struct mce)))
- print_mce(m, &first);
+ print_mce(m);
}
if (final)
- print_mce(final, &first);
+ print_mce(final);
if (cpu_missing)
printk(KERN_EMERG "Some CPUs didn't answer in synchronization\n");
print_mce_tail();
--
1.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/