Re: [PATCH 1/13] cpumask: Use accessors for cpu_*_mask: arm
From: Russell King
Date: Sat Jun 13 2009 - 09:49:49 EST
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:25:12PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:33:03 am Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:33:14PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
> > > are const).
> > Please check linux-next - there are all kinds of SMP changes currently
> > queued up in the ARM tree, which include most of the updates for things
> > like this.
> OK, here's the revision based on latest linux-next, if you wouldn't mind
> taking it. (We should really make on_each_cpu_mask an arch-indep, too).
Hmm, weird. Your diff is against does not correspond with my tree, which
supposedly is in linux-next.
Commit 8266810 "[ARM] smp: fix cpumask usage in ARM SMP code" (in my tree
since May 17th) fixes some of the areas which your patch touches. See:
I suggest hanging fire on this until the ARM tree is merged into mainline.
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/