Re: [PATCH 4/7] tracing: replace a GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNELallocation

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Atomic allocation is not needed here.
> 
> [ Impact: clean up of memory alloction type ]

Note, the impact line was probably not needed here - and if we add 
one then the correct one would be:

 [ Impact: use less failure-prone (non-atomic) allocations ]

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/