Re: HTC Dream aka. t-mobile g1 support
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Jun 15 2009 - 13:07:23 EST
> > Actually I agree with Brian here, this is better done at kernel level.
> > OTOH, at least initially, it does not need to be done at all. It will
> > make battery readings less reliable but hey... the battery meter does
> > not work reliably anyway and estimating capacity left from voltage
> > acceptably on other platforms...
> I'd agree. This stuff can wait until the core support is solid. I'd
> fight harder for conditional support for wakelocks since that has a
> much bigger impact on battery life (being able to know when it's safe
> to power collapse in idle, etc), whereas this just improves the
> accuracy of the battery gauging.
Yes, wakelocks are more important than battery gauging... but they
need core support :-(; and they can wait, too.
Getting serial support & board-dream upstream are very good first
steps (thanks!). I'm currently trying to get 2.6.30 + your series of 3
+ framebuffer changes to boot.
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/