Re: [2.6.29.x+ FIX] CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend onCONFIG_BLOCK
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Jun 15 2009 - 17:46:00 EST
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:46:30 +0200
Tom____ Sz__pe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fix: CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK.
> Patch against 2.6.29.*, 2.6.30, current.
> inlined please find a trivial fix that makes it possible to run
> complete systems out of an initramfs on current kernels again
> (this last worked on 2.6.27.*).
Please describe the problem more completely. Why is it not possible?
What goes wrong? Your initramfs kernel has CONFIG_BLOCK=n?
Also, please do include a Signed-off-by: with each patch - see
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for a description.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/