Re: [PATCH 5/7] add syscall tracepoints

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Li Zefan wrote:

> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:24:59PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> >> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls
> >>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h |    4 ++--
> >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> index bd2c651..d16d195 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> >> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> >>  
> >>  /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */
> > 
> > 
> > BTW, is there a way to know this size dynamically?
> > Or is there already a hardcoded number of syscalls somewhere
> > in x86?
> > 
> 
> Does this patchset head for .31 or .32? If for .32, then this patch should
> go into .31 I think.

Probably the best to run it through tip for a release. So, yes this patch 
should go to the beginning of the queue so that we can push it to 31 if 
need be.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/