Re: [PATCH 1/6] staging: android: binder: Remove some funny &&usage

[Daniel Walker]

On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:59 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>   	int ret = 0;
> >> -	int wait_for_proc_work;
> >> +	int wait_for_proc_work = 0;
> >>
> >>   	if (*consumed == 0) {
> >>   		if (put_user(BR_NOOP, (uint32_t __user *)ptr))
> >> @@ -2155,8 +2155,8 @@ static int binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc,
> >>   	}
> >>
> >>   retry:
> >> -	wait_for_proc_work = thread->transaction_stack == NULL&&
> >> -				list_empty(&thread->todo);
> >> +	if (list_empty(&thread->todo)&&  thread->transaction_stack == NULL)
> >> +		wait_for_proc_work = 1;
> >>    
> >
> > I think the original looks cleaner (in both cases).  Assigning a  
> > variable with the result of a boolean expression is perfectly  
> > reasonable.  Perhaps change the type of the variable to "bool" to make  
> > it a bit clearer what's going on.
> >
> > (It would be a different matter if any of the expression had side-effects.)
> 
> Plus you have broken whitespace in there, changed performance
> characteristics (list_empty now done first) and with gotos used around
> that code I'm not at all sure transformation is equivalent.

The broken whitespace was only in replies to the original patch, not
sure how it made it in there. We already resolved most of what your
commenting. Unless you care to comment on a later email.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/