[patch 22/30] parport_pc: set properly the dma_mask for parport_pc device

[Greg KH]

2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit dfa7c4d869b7d3d37b70f1de856f2901b6ebfcf0 upstream.

parport_pc_probe_port() creates the own 'parport_pc' device if the
device argument is NULL. Then parport_pc_probe_port() doesn't
initialize the dma_mask and coherent_dma_mask of the device and calls
dma_alloc_coherent with it. dma_alloc_coherent fails because
dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't accept the uninitialized dma_mask:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/16/150

Long ago, X86_32 and X86_64 had the own dma_alloc_coherent
implementations; X86_32 accepted a device having dma_mask that is not
initialized however X86_64 didn't. When we merged them, we chose to
prohibit a device having dma_mask that is not initialized. I think
that it's good to require drivers to set up dma_mask (and
coherent_dma_mask) properly if the drivers want DMA.

Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Malcom Blaney <malcolm.blaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/parport/parport_pc.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
@@ -2211,6 +2211,9 @@ struct parport *parport_pc_probe_port (u
 		if (IS_ERR(pdev))
 			return NULL;
 		dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+		dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(24);
+		dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
 	}
 
 	ops = kmalloc(sizeof (struct parport_operations), GFP_KERNEL);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/