Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.

[Changli Gao]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Amerigo Wang<xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Are you familiar with splice() and tee()? They both use pipes as kernel buffers.
>
> You are not answering the question, obviously.
When you use pipes as kernel buffer handlers, two fd isn't necessary.
Using one will save half of fd resources. Is it obviously?

>
> And you snipped too much, how can you return that fd? Using the return value?
one RW file descriptor is returned. I have answered this in the first post.

> Ah! This will probably break the user-space program...
>
I don't think so. As a skillful programmer, who will trasfter pipe() a
NULL pointer? In any way, it is break sth, but not very seriously, and
won't affact any right and robust program.


-- 
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/