Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic

[Michael Guntsche]

On Jul 6, 2009, at 20:18, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:07:34 +0200
> Michael Guntsche <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 6, 2009, at 19:17, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > This is the more drastic way of doing it. I had hoped to put this
> > > off but
> > > in fact it cleans stuff up enormously. This has had only basic  
> > > testing
> > > but the underlying idea is to simply remove all the pty special  
> > > casing
> > > that causes messes in the first place.
> > <snip>
> >
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > Must commit a6540f731d506d9e82444cf0020e716613d4c46c still be  
> > reverted
> > with your patch or can it stay in?
>
> Herbert is (as usual ;)) correct that it should be reverted.

No crashes with the reverted commit and Alan's patch on my hardware  
here.
A Load Test that would trigger it after some seconds is now running  
for several minutes without any problems.

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/