Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2009-07-03 09:59:35, tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
>  > That's why we have ethernet checksums. 
> 
> which of course just changes the number of bits. The argument remains
> the same. 

Ok, so what is your estimate of XP crash probability?

>  > It already _was_ perfect before you started patching it.
> 
> wow, I really didn't expect the objection to my patch to be that VFAT
> is perfect!

But ... it was, and there is still possibility of just using position
in directory to avoid collisions completely.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/