Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sure and I'd say the technical issues are simple
>
> - Tridge's patch breaks stuff
> - Tridge's patch masquerades as vfat but isn't.
>
> We can fix those by only creating short names (but honouring existing
> long ones) and by not claiming its vfat.

As technical stand, I agree with this approach. And my poor brain can't
consider other than technical thing, it is purely my problem though. So
I'll try to create the patch based on first version, and I'll apply it
instead.

And could you please stop talking about other than technical issues? My
poor brain is already overflowed.

I'm a fool?  Yes, I agree.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/