Re: [RFC][PATCH] Check write to slab memory which freed alreadyusing mudflap

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi David,

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 02:41 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> The reason why I'd like to see slqb merged as a non-default alternative is 
> because it exposes the allocator to more benchmarking coverage than would 
> be possible in any other environment and attracts much more attention to 
> development for those who don't pull Pekka's tree directly.

Yes, we can do that. But I'm not going to ask Linus to pull something
that has known _boot-time_ bugs (that we haven't been able to figure out
in over three months!) because it's a pretty clear indication that we're
not on top of things yet.

So if you want to fast-track SLQB, feel free to help out Nick in
debugging that sucker ;).

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/