Re: [RFC][PATCH] Check write to slab memory which freed alreadyusing mudflap

[David Rientjes]

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> I'm not sure it's such a hard decision. SLAB is on it's way out because
> SLUB and SLQB code are much cleaner and the debugging support is better.

I don't think that is good enough reason.  CONFIG_SLAB is by far the 
optimal choice for netperf TCP_RR on >= 16 cpus and pushing it out of the 
tree, even though it is no longer the default option, isn't an option for 
those of us who live by performance even if it comes at the cost of a 
dirtier implementation (enhanced debugging support doesn't even register 
on my radar since it's useless in a production environment).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/