Re: [PATCH 0/2] CGroups: cgroup member list enhancement/fix

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Tue Jul 14 2009 - 01:56:49 EST


* menage@xxxxxxxxxx <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-07-13 09:26:26]:

> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Balbir Singh<balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > How about lazy migration? Mark a group as to move when the kernel sees
> > it next for scheduling.
>
> Waiting for the next scheduling point might be too long, since a
> thread can block for arbitrary amounts of time and keeping the marker
> around for arbitrary time (unless we add a new task_struct field)
> would be tricky. Marking the cgroup or tgid as being migrated which
> then triggers the extra synchronization in the fork path (but which
> isn't needed at other times) is probably where we'll end up.


Hmm... but we would not need that information till we schedule the
tasks, adding a field to task_struct is what I had in mind.

--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/