Re: [PATCH 2/3] cciss: use only one scan thread

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:15:59 +0000 Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > > +}
> > 
> > We already did init_completion(h->scan_wait) at startup time?  Doing
> > the INIT_COMPLETION() here looks unusual and is hopefully unnecessary.
> > 
> 
> I am following the text in the "Linux Device Drivers 3rd Edition section
> 5.4:
> 
> "A completion is normally a one-shot device; it is used once then
> discarded. It is possible, however, to reuse completion structures if
> proper care is taken. If complete_all is not used, a completion
> structure can be reused without any problems as long as there is no
> ambiguity about what event is being signalled. If you use complete_all,
> however, you must reinitialize the completion structure before reusing
> it. The macro:
> 
> INIT_COMPLETION(struct completion c);
> 
> can be used to quickly perform this reinitialization."
> 
> It there are better way to do this? INIT_COMPLETION() currently just
> sets done = 0.

OK, I'd assumed that a full wait_for_completion()/complete() operation
would leave the completion in ready-to-use-again state.

But wait_for_completion_interruptible() can indeed leave
completion.done in a non-zero state if it was interrupted by a signal.
hm.  Perhaps so the caller can run wait_for_completion*() again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/