Re: [PATCH] x86: NX protection for kernel data

From: Siarhei Liakh
Date: Sun Jul 19 2009 - 20:15:34 EST


On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Arjan van de Ven<arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:43:06 -0400
> Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This patch expands functionality of CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA to set main
>> (static) kernel data area as NX.
>> The following steps are taken to achieve this:
>> 1. Linker scripts are adjusted so .text always starts and end on a
>> page boundary 2. Linker scripts are adjusted so .rodata and .data
>> always starts and end on a page boundary
>> 3. void mark_nxdata_nx(void) added to arch/x86/mm/init_64.c and
>> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c with actual functionality: NX is set for all
>> pages from _etext through _edata
>> 4. mark_nxdata_nx() called from init_post(void) in init/main.c
>>
>> The patch have been developed for Linux 2.6.30 x86 by Siarhei Liakh
>> <sliakh.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> and Xuxian Jiang <jiang@xxxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> I like the idea, and am happy to see the lack of ifdefs ;)

I was thinking about ifdefs, but could not find a place to put them in ;)

> I wonder if we should have a testcase for this though similar to
> how stackprotector and rodata get tested already....

We probably should. In addition, after looking at the code for a
while, it seems to me that the proper place to enable protection would
be kernel_physical_mapping_init(). This way the kernel could enjoy
protection from the very beginning of init, instead of turning it on
at the end.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/