RE: [PATCH 1/3] add flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND in 'struct irqaction'

[Lu, Guanqun]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 10:18 PM
>To: Rafael J. Wysocki
>Cc: Lu, Guanqun; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxx; jeremy@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] add flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND in 'struct irqaction'
>
>On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> On Friday 17 July 2009, Guanqun Lu wrote:
>> > We currently only bypass IRQF_TIMER in '__disable_irq',
>> > but Xen specific IRQs should not be disabled either.
>> > This commit adds a new flag to accompolish this goal
>> > without being mixed up with IRQF_TIMER flag.
>>
>> For some obscure reasons [2/3] didn't reach my inbox.  The other 2 patches
>> look fine to me.
>
>I do not receive the patches at all. Can you please resend and cc me ?

Resent now, let me know it doesn't get to your inbox again.

Guanqun

>
>Thanks,
>
>	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/