Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

>  > Actually, why not having dosfsck creating _matching_ short names for
>  > long names? As it only writes short names, it should be safe :-).
> 
> As I mentioned to Boaz, what usually matters for claim construction in
> patents is the overall system. I'm sure John Lanza would be happy to
> run through it with you if you want a more legally detailed answer,
> but basically breaking it up within the one system isn't likely to
> help us.

Hehe, or we could create just long names and mark filesystem as
"needing repair" so that Windows fixes it up for us on next mount ;-).
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/