Re: [GIT pull] genirq fixes for 2.6.31

[Kevin Winchester]

Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +/*
>   * Interrupt handler thread
>   */
>  static int irq_thread(void *data)
> @@ -458,6 +494,8 @@ static int irq_thread(void *data)
>  
>  	while (!irq_wait_for_interrupt(action)) {
>  
> +		irq_thread_check_affinity(desc, action);
> +
>  		atomic_inc(&desc->threads_active);
>  
>  		spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);

Any chance we could do this in a way that doesn't break the build for CONFIG_SMP=n? :)

Should this call simply be wrapped in an #ifdef, or should the function be defined for !SMP?

-- 
Kevin Winchester


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/