[Patch RFC 21/37] affs: use semaphore_init instead of init_MUTEX

[Thomas Gleixner]

The usage of these "mutex" is non obvious and probably a completion
in some places. Make it them semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/affs/super.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/fs/affs/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/fs/affs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/fs/affs/super.c
@@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ static void init_once(void *foo)
 {
 	struct affs_inode_info *ei = (struct affs_inode_info *) foo;
 
-	init_MUTEX(&ei->i_link_lock);
-	init_MUTEX(&ei->i_ext_lock);
+	semaphore_init(&ei->i_link_lock);
+	semaphore_init(&ei->i_ext_lock);
 	inode_init_once(&ei->vfs_inode);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/