Re: [PATCH V2] au1xmmc: dev_pm_ops conversion

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Sunday 26 July 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:39:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > Yes, they would.  In general, you'd probably want to do something like this:
> 
> > static struct dev_pm_ops au1xmmc_pmops = {
> > 	.resume		= au1xmmc_resume,
> > 	.suspend		= au1xmmc_suspend,
> > 	.freeze		= au1xmmc_resume,
> > 	.thaw		= au1xmmc_suspend,
> 
> I'd have expected freeze and thaw to be the other way around here?

Sure, sorry.

.suspend() corresponds to .freeze() and .poweroff(), while .resume()
corresponds to .thaw() and .restore().

Best,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/