Re: [PATCH 32/32] ARM: OMAP: RX51: set MMC capabilities and power-savingflag

From: Adrian Hunter
Date: Mon Jul 27 2009 - 04:58:19 EST


ext Matt Fleming wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:58:56AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Matt Fleming wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 03:43:53PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>From 3865867159f25cf706480236f6d4f0e4adde5dac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:32:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: RX51: set MMC capabilities and power-saving flag

Specify MMC capabilities and set the power-saving flag
for RX51.

After the changes to [PATCH 7/32], this becomes,
I think this will leave every other board that uses omap_hsmmc
without any card caps.


Doh. You're right, good catch!

What about adding something like this:


diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index 8900bae..f2548f1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -1720,6 +1720,11 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;

mmc->caps |= mmc_slot(host).caps;
+ /* If no card caps specified then assume them all */
+ if (!((mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SD) ||
+ (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_MMC) ||
+ (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO)))
+ mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD & MMC_CAP_MMC & MMC_CAP_SDIO;

omap_hsmmc_conf_bus_power(host);


Those & should be |

/* If no card caps specified then assume them all */
if (!((mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SD) ||
(mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_MMC) ||
(mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO)))
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD | MMC_CAP_MMC | MMC_CAP_SDIO;

or more compactly,

/* If no card caps specified then assume them all */
if (!(mmc->caps & (MMC_CAP_SD | MMC_CAP_SDIO | MMC_CAP_MMC)))
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD | MMC_CAP_MMC | MMC_CAP_SDIO;

Yes much nicer. Will you add it to your patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/