Re: [PATCH 1/4] Support named cgroups hierarchies

[Paul Menage]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Li Zefan<lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Because it's not needed for the entire scope of the function. Keeping
>> its scope as small as possible makes it clearer what it's being used
>> for.
>>
>
> If we had been doing this, we'll see many:
>
>        (no if, while, for)
>        {
>                ...
>        }
>
> in kernel code, but I don't remember I ever saw this style.
>

Documentation/CodingStyle is silent on this subject. But OK, I've
moved new_root back to the top level. I think that it's a net loss to
readability though.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/