Re: Oprofile warnings

From: Robert Richter
Date: Tue Aug 04 2009 - 12:44:18 EST

Next message: Robert Richter: "Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix advance of reader in rb_buffer_peek()"
Previous message: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH] cpusets: rework guarantee_online_cpus() to fix deadlockwith cpu_down()"
In reply to: Zdenek Kabelac: "Oprofile warnings"
Next in thread: Robert Richter: "Re: Oprofile warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 04.08.09 17:12:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Hi
>
> These two warning messages appeared in my message log while using oprofile.
> (2.6.31-rc5 and oprofile-0.9.4-13.fc12.x86_64)

I sent out a fix of the ring buffer code to Steven and lkml on Jul
31. The patch is not yet in a tree.

-Robert

--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@xxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Richter: "Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix advance of reader in rb_buffer_peek()"
Previous message: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH] cpusets: rework guarantee_online_cpus() to fix deadlockwith cpu_down()"
In reply to: Zdenek Kabelac: "Oprofile warnings"
Next in thread: Robert Richter: "Re: Oprofile warnings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]