Re: [PATCH] perfcounters: Support for ftrace event records sampling

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 22:21 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > +static void ftrace_profile_##call(proto)                             \
> > > > +{                                                                    \
> > > > +     struct ftrace_data_offsets_##call __maybe_unused __data_offsets;\
> > > > +     struct ftrace_event_call *event_call = &event_##call;           \
> > > > +     extern void perf_tpcounter_event(int, u64, u64, void *, int);   \
> > > > +     struct ftrace_raw_##call *entry;                                \
> > > > +     u64 __addr = 0, __count = 1;                                    \
> > > > +     unsigned long irq_flags;                                        \
> > > > +     int __entry_size;                                               \
> > > > +     int __data_size;                                                \
> > > > +     int pc;                                                         \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +     local_save_flags(irq_flags);                                    \
> > > > +     pc = preempt_count();                                           \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +     __data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
> > > > +     __entry_size = __data_size + sizeof(*entry);                    \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +     do {                                                            \
> > > > +             char raw_data[__entry_size];                            \
> > > > +             struct trace_entry *ent;                                \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +             entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data;           \
> > > > +             ent = &entry->ent;                                      \
> > > > +             tracing_generic_entry_update(ent, irq_flags, pc);       \
> > > > +             ent->type = event_call->id;                             \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +             tstruct                                                 \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +             { assign; }                                             \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +             perf_tpcounter_event(event_call->id, __addr, __count, entry,\
> > > > +                          __entry_size);                             \
> > > > +     } while (0);                                                    \
> > > > +                                                                     \
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > ok, so the one concern I have here is that the data needs to fit on the
> > > stack. What if someone puts a large string in the data?
> > 
> > Also, how NMI safe is all that?
> 
> 
> Everything is allocated in the stack. It's NMI safe AFAICS, am I missing
> something?

I've no idea what all those trace calls do, I was hoping you would and
say, sure, no problem ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/