Re: [patch] cache-miss and cache-refs events on P6-mobile CPUs

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 11:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static const u64 p6_perfmon_event_map[] 
> >  {
> >    [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES]		= 0x0079,
> >    [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS]		= 0x00c0,
> > -  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES]	= 0x0000,
> > -  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES]		= 0x0000,
> > +  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES]	= 0x0f2e,
> > +  [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES]		= 0x012e,
> 
> 2e is total numer of L2 events,
> 
> 0f is all mesi states
> 01 is invalid states

here's Intel's own description:

 I_STATE 0x01 Counts how many times requests miss the cache.
 MESI    0x0F Counts how many times cache lines in any state are accessed.

so it's pretty close in practice. The only counts that are a bit 
inapplicable are fetches/prefetches it initiates on its own (they 
are included here) - but those too are related to the workload in 
general, so it's good as an approximation.

It's definitely better than 0x00 IMO. What do you think?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/