Re: [patch 02/14] remove clocksource inline functions

From: Martin Schwidefsky
Date: Fri Aug 14 2009 - 04:11:29 EST


On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:14:34 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:40 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> [snip]
> > @@ -477,8 +492,7 @@ static int timekeeping_resume(struct sys
> > }
> > update_xtime_cache(0);
> > /* re-base the last cycle value */
> > - clock->cycle_last = 0;
> > - clock->cycle_last = clocksource_read(clock);
> > + clock->cycle_last = clock->read(clock);
>
> Minor bug here, the clearing of cycle_last has a side-effect of making
> sure the TSC doesn't trip over its own cycle_last checking in the read()
> function. This is part of the uglyness of the TSC pulling this internal
> timeekping state to avoid minor inconsistencies, but until we find a
> better way, we have to live with it.
>
> So you'll need to preserve the cycle_last = 0 line.

Whoa, now that is subtle. Good spotting. I would prefer to reset the
cycle_last in a resume function though:

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -744,10 +744,16 @@ static cycle_t __vsyscall_fn vread_tsc(v
}
#endif

+static void resume_tsc(void)
+{
+ clocksource_tsc.cycle_last = 0;
+}
+
static struct clocksource clocksource_tsc = {
.name = "tsc",
.rating = 300,
.read = read_tsc,
+ .resume = resume_tsc,
.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64),
.shift = 22,
.flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS |

That puts the subtlety where it belongs.

--
blue skies,
Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/