Re: [patch 02/11] fat: cleanup fat_put_super()

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> unload_nls() can be called with a NULL pointer now. Remove the pointer
> checks and the NULLification of the pointers as the data structure
> which contains the pointers is kfree'd right away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fat/inode.c |   16 ++++------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/fs/fat/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/fs/fat/inode.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/fs/fat/inode.c
> @@ -470,19 +470,11 @@ static void fat_put_super(struct super_b
>  
>  	iput(sbi->fat_inode);
>  
> -	if (sbi->nls_disk) {
> -		unload_nls(sbi->nls_disk);
> -		sbi->nls_disk = NULL;
> -		sbi->options.codepage = fat_default_codepage;
> -	}
> -	if (sbi->nls_io) {
> -		unload_nls(sbi->nls_io);
> -		sbi->nls_io = NULL;
> -	}
> -	if (sbi->options.iocharset != fat_default_iocharset) {
> +	unload_nls(sbi->nls_disk);
> +	unload_nls(sbi->nls_io);

I don't object to this, however, personally I'd prefer to check NULL
explicitly, including brelse().

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/