Re: [PATCH][RFC] security: constify seq_operations

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On 08/11/2009 10:47 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> A while ago I made a semantic patch to introduce const on file_operations
> and and input_device_id types.  I tested it on 142 files in which the
> change had already been made and got the same result in each case.  I have
> run it on linux-next and obtained the attached result.  However, I have
> not checked any of these results, so this is not meant as a submitted
> patch, but as a starting point for someone who wants to look further into
> the problem.
>
> julia

snip

> diff -u -p a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c
> --- a/fs/ubifs/xattr.c 2009-06-27 09:35:06.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/xattr.c 2009-08-11 22:42:24.000000000 +0200
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ enum {
>
>   static struct inode_operations none_inode_operations;
>   static struct address_space_operations none_address_operations;
> -static struct file_operations none_file_operations;
> +static const struct file_operations none_file_operations;

Fixed this in UBIFS. Also made the inode operation const. Thanks.
Pushed to ubifs-2.6.git:
http://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git/commit/2d132c333e9f88684801c9b80e6ba086da4f0ea0

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/