Re: kernel segv with 2.6.31-rc6 ?

[Roland McGrath]

> I'd be happy to fail to load it.  There might be sysfs issues with it too.

That sounds reasonable to me.  And I'd be happy to at least look a little
and maybe give some advice to anybody who finds themself building such a
(free) module, doesn't know why or how it got that way, and wants to ask.

> No, the real problem is that it ignores failure.  I'd much rather fail
> the module load than various features mysteriously MIA.

In that regard, I just made add_notes_attrs() follow the model of
add_sect_attrs(), which (gracefully) ignores all its failures.  I don't
know what the thought behind that was.  My only guess was that since this
is all CONFIG_KALLSYMS-only features, that someone thought turning on
CONFIG_KALLSYMS should not add new ways to lose that weren't there before,
only new ways to lose the new features that weren't there before either.
Having these other alloc/sysfs failures cause the module load to fail would
certainly be fine with me.


Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/