Re: linux-next: usb/pxa trees build failure

[Eric Miao]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:05:25PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:58:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi Eric, Greg,
>>>>
>>>> The next-20090817 (and a few before) build (arm trizeps4_defconfig)
>>>> failed like this:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-pxa27x.c:507: error: 'pdev' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>>
>>>> Caused by the interaction of commit
>>>> 6458baec17e19d38b9d4eb1f96c213f91609c0e3 ("USB: ohci-pxa27x: Reconfigure
>>>> power settings on resume") from the usb tree with commit
>>>> b8fb7d4317bcea1b48c9560d23dff81121870ece ("[ARM] pxa: update
>>>> ohci-pxa27x.c to use 'struct dev_pm_ops'"). from the pxa tree.
>>>>
>>>> Greg/Aric, maybe that usb tree patch needs to go through the pxa tree?
>>>> (and maybe "USB: ohci-pxa27x: Allow NOCP and OCPM to be cleared" as well?)
>>>>
>>>> [this also broke the following configs: magician_defconfig,
>>>> em_x270_defconfig and cm_x2xx_defconfig.]
>>> Ick, not good.  Aric, should I drop this patch from my tree?
>>>
>> I think so, might be better to go through the pxa tree so that I can give
>> another review. (the fiber across the pacific seems to be broken again, so
>> I have to look into this tomorrow, still fetching -next, sigh).
> 
> Ok, let me know if you want me to drop these patches from my tree.
> 

OK, so the problem is 'pdev' is no longer part of the dev_pm_ops, ('dev' is used
instead), and the 'inf' pointer can just be referenced from 'dev->platform_data',
so the fix is actually trivial, but it does have dependency issue.

Greg,

It looks to me would be better if this goes the pxa tree, and I'll send out the
updated patch of 6458baec later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/