Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

>> page_referenced_file?
>> I think we should change page_referenced().
>
> Yeah, good catch.
>
>>
>> Instead, How about this?
>> ==============================================
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm: stop circulating of referenced mlocked pages
>>
>> Currently, mlock() systemcall doesn't gurantee to mark the page PG_Mlocked
>
>                                                    mark PG_mlocked
>
>> because some race prevent page grabbing.
>> In that case, instead vmscan move the page to unevictable lru.
>>
>> However, Recently Wu Fengguang pointed out current vmscan logic isn't so
>> efficient.
>> mlocked page can move circulatly active and inactive list because
>> vmscan check the page is referenced _before_ cull mlocked page.
>>
>> Plus, vmscan should mark PG_Mlocked when cull mlocked page.
>
>                           PG_mlocked
>
>> Otherwise vm stastics show strange number.
>>
>> This patch does that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.



>> Index: b/mm/rmap.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c       2009-08-18 19:48:14.000000000 +0900
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c       2009-08-18 23:47:34.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -362,7 +362,9 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa
>>        * unevictable list.
>>        */
>>       if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
>> -             *mapcount = 1;  /* break early from loop */
>> +             *mapcount = 1;          /* break early from loop */
>> +             *vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED; /* for prevent to move active list */
>
>> +             try_set_page_mlocked(vma, page);
>
> That call is not absolutely necessary?

Why? I haven't catch your point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/