Re: Atom processor inclusion

[Tobias Doerffel]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 12:50:29 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> Yep, it looked acceptable - Tobias, do you have any
> updates / latest version of that patch?
No - it's still the improved version I posted at the end of May [1]. The 
question is what to do with MODULE_PROC_FAMILY (CORE2 or ATOM) and the mtune-
fallback (generic, i686, ...)?

Regards,

Tobias


[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/29/374

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.