Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tracing: Make syscall_(un)regfunc arch-specific

From: Paul Mundt
Date: Sun Aug 23 2009 - 21:40:35 EST


On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:58:43PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> > The bodies of syscall_regfunc and syscall_unregfunc need the
> > arch-specific flag TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT, which only exists
> > on x86 and s390, so they should live in arch-specific files.
>
> Sh also does, but currently in a seperate development branch.
> (Adding Paul Mundt in Cc to prevent from further linux-next breakage).
>
Thanks, I'll take care of this as well as the other ftrace syscalls
breakage during the merge window. At the moment I don't have any good
ideas on how to fix the workflow issues, and -tip likewise doesn't care
about -next impact, so there's somewhat of an impasse.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/